HOLDINGS: [1]-Choice-of-law issues were not a basis for denying class certification on predominance and/or commonality grounds because California law should apply to all members of the former employee’s proposed class; the members were all California residents whose claims arose exclusively from work performed within the state; [2]-A class action was the superior method for resolving […]
Overview
HOLDINGS: [1]-In light of the completed eviction, the Panel was not in a position to provide the relief sought via the appeal from the TRO Denial Order. Accordingly, the appeal in BAP No. CC-13-1345 was equitably moot; [2]-The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when it abstained from exercising jurisdiction over the First Adversary […]